·

What’s New in Cybersecurity This Week: Projects, Videos, Articles & Podcasts I’m Following – 1/12/26

Welcome to my weekly cybersecurity roundup! Here, I share updates on the projects I’m currently working on, along with the most insightful cybersecurity videos I watched, articles I found valuable, and podcasts I tuned into this week.

Featured Analysis

Featured article analysis: California bans data broker reselling health data of millions

The recent enforcement action by the California Privacy Protection Agency against Datamasters highlights a critical turning point in the regulation of the data brokerage industry. By banning the Texas-based firm from reselling the sensitive health data of millions, including records on individuals with Alzheimer’s and drug addiction, the state has signaled that the era of unregulated trafficking in medical vulnerabilities is coming to an end. This move is not merely a bureaucratic slap on the wrist but a direct application of the California Delete Act, which mandates transparency and provides consumers with a centralized mechanism to reclaim their digital autonomy.

The urgency of this intervention cannot be overstated, as the commodification of such intimate information creates profound risks that extend far beyond intrusive advertising. When lists of people struggling with cognitive decline or financial instability are bought and sold, they become high-value targets for predatory actors and sophisticated fraud schemes. Given these stakes, your view that this oversight is worth doing is well-founded; the potential for real-world harm necessitates a regulatory framework that prioritizes human safety over the profit margins of “shadowy middlemen” who operate without public consent.

Ultimately, this case serves as a vital proof of concept for the newly launched Delete Request and Opt-out Platform (DROP). While the industry has long relied on the practical impossibility of consumers contacting hundreds of individual brokers to delete their data, California’s centralized approach shifts the burden of compliance back onto the corporations. As other states look to this model, the permanent removal of non-compliant firms from the marketplace provides a necessary deterrent, ensuring that the protection of sensitive health information is treated as a fundamental right rather than an optional business practice.

Projects

Articles

Podcasts

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,