Tag: Russia

  • What’s New in Cybersecurity This Week: Projects, Videos, Articles & Podcasts I’m Following – 10/27/25

    What’s New in Cybersecurity This Week: Projects, Videos, Articles & Podcasts I’m Following – 10/27/25

    Welcome to my weekly cybersecurity roundup! Here, I share updates on the projects I’m currently working on, along with the most insightful cybersecurity videos I watched, articles I found valuable, and podcasts I tuned into this week.

    Featured Analysis

    Featured article analysis: You have one week to opt out or become fodder for LinkedIn AI training

    LinkedIn’s updated data use policy, effective November 3, 2025, marks a significant expansion in its program of scraping user data for AI model training. Crucially, this policy change eliminates previous geographic exemptions, extending the practice to members in the UK, the European Union (EU), the European Economic Area (EEA), Switzerland, Canada, and Hong Kong. For professionals in these regions, virtually all publicly available data—including profile details and posts—is now fair game for harvesting. This move places LinkedIn squarely within a major global trend where tech giants are re-engineering terms of service to fuel their generative AI ventures, often raising the ire of members who explicitly provided their professional data for networking, not for mass training of commercial machine learning tools.

    Beyond personal privacy, this policy shift introduces complex challenges for corporate governance, compliance, and legal teams. By sharing scraped data with affiliates, specifically Microsoft, LinkedIn is blurring the lines between its professional network data and the broader commercial interests of its parent company. The article notes that this data will be used to show more personalized ads, which may include sensitive insights gleaned from professional activity. Furthermore, the mandatory “opt-out” mechanism—instead of an “opt-in” model—is likely to face intense scrutiny in regions with stringent privacy legislation like the GDPR. The default setting of allowing data use creates a regulatory risk, potentially positioning LinkedIn for future legal challenges regarding the lack of explicit, freely given consent.

    The analysis serves as a clear call to action, emphasizing that professionals in the newly included regions have a narrow window to safeguard their data. The process is a two-step affair: first, opting out of AI training under the Settings > Data Privacy menu, and second, adjusting the relevant preferences under the Advertising Data category to prevent data sharing with Microsoft affiliates for ad purposes. For a LinkedIn audience—whose primary asset is their meticulously curated professional identity—understanding and executing these opt-out steps is an urgent necessity. Failure to act defaults their professional biographies and content into the engine that powers the next generation of AI tools, permanently changing the intended use and ownership of their digital profile.

    Projects

    • TryHackMe – CyberChef: The Basics – In Progress

    Videos

    Articles

  • What’s New in Cybersecurity This Week: Projects, Videos, Articles & Podcasts I’m Following – 5/12/25

    What’s New in Cybersecurity This Week: Projects, Videos, Articles & Podcasts I’m Following – 5/12/25

    Welcome to my weekly cybersecurity roundup! Here, I share updates on the projects I’m currently working on, along with the most insightful cybersecurity videos I watched, articles I found valuable, and podcasts I tuned into this week.

    Featured Analysis

    Featured article analysis: Broadcom employee data stolen by ransomware crooks following hit on payroll provider

    This serves as a reminder of the risks inherent in supply chains, particularly concerning sensitive data like payroll information. The fact that a ransomware attack on Business Systems House (BSH), a Middle Eastern partner of ADP, led to the theft of Broadcom employee data highlights the vulnerabilities that can exist even when an organization outsources critical functions. The timeline is particularly noteworthy: the initial ransomware attack occurred in September 2024, BSH/ADP became aware of data exfiltration in December 2024, yet Broadcom wasn’t informed until May 2025. This significant delay underscores the challenges in incident detection, investigation, and notification across multiple entities, leaving affected individuals in the dark for an extended period and hindering their ability to take timely protective measures. The article also subtly emphasizes the importance of vendor security assessments and the need for robust contractual agreements outlining breach notification timelines and responsibilities.

    The attribution of the attack to the El Dorado ransomware group, with potential links to the BlackLock group, adds another layer of complexity and intrigue for threat intelligence followers. The rapid emergence and rebranding (or suspected rebranding) of ransomware groups are common tactics to evade law enforcement and maintain operational continuity. The report of infostealer data compromising employee accounts and potentially leading to wider third-party breaches through stolen credentials further illustrates the multi-faceted nature of modern ransomware attacks. The mention of Hudson Rock’s findings regarding compromised accounts and the potential impact on 35 additional companies underscores the lateral movement capabilities that attackers often exploit after initial access. This emphasizes the need for organizations to not only secure their own perimeters but also to implement strong internal segmentation and monitoring to limit the blast radius of any potential compromise originating from a third-party incident.

    Finally, the types of data potentially stolen – including national IDs, financial account numbers, salary details, and home addresses – represent a high-value target for cybercriminals and pose significant risks to the affected Broadcom employees. The advice given by Broadcom to enable multi-factor authentication and monitor financial records is standard but crucial in the aftermath of such a breach. ADP’s attempt to distance itself by emphasizing that their own systems were not compromised and that only a “small subset” of clients were affected highlights the reputational damage and legal liabilities that can arise from third-party breaches. The case also underscores the complexities of the double extortion model, where data is both encrypted and exfiltrated, leaving victims with little incentive to pay a ransom if the attackers have already demonstrated a willingness to publish stolen information. For cybersecurity professionals, this incident serves as a valuable case study in understanding supply chain risks, incident response challenges, and the evolving tactics of ransomware actors.

    Projects

    • TryHackMe – Cryptography Basics – In Progress

    Articles

    Podcasts